4.6 Article

Single Camera-Based Remote Physical Therapy: Verification on a Large Video Dataset

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12020799

Keywords

remote therapy; markerless; pose detection; motion capture; physical rehabilitation; OpenPose; telerehabilitation; telemedicine

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science & Technology, Israel
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
  3. Inter-Excellence MEYS CR [LTAIZ19008]
  4. MOST Israel [LTAIZ19008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, systems using common RGB cameras to capture human motion in real-time have been developed. This approach has the potential to be widely used for remote exercise evaluation at no additional cost. However, there has been limited research on detecting basic body parts under different conditions for rehabilitation in home environments.
In recent years, several systems have been developed to capture human motion in real-time using common RGB cameras. This approach has great potential to become widespread among the general public as it allows the remote evaluation of exercise at no additional cost. The concept of using these systems in rehabilitation in the home environment has been discussed, but no work has addressed the practical problem of detecting basic body parts under different sensing conditions on a large scale. In this study, we evaluate the ability of the OpenPose pose estimation algorithm to perform keypoint detection of anatomical landmarks under different conditions. We infer the quality of detection based on the keypoint confidence values reported by the OpenPose. We used more than two thousand unique exercises for the evaluation. We focus on the influence of the camera view and the influence of the position of the trainees, which are essential in terms of the use for home exercise. Our results show that the position of the trainee has the greatest effect, in the following increasing order of suitability across all camera views: lying position, position on the knees, sitting position, and standing position. On the other hand, the effect of the camera view was only marginal, showing that the side view is having slightly worse results. The results might also indicate that the quality of detection of lower body joints is lower across all conditions than the quality of detection of upper body joints. In this practical overview, we present the possibilities and limitations of current camera-based systems in telerehabilitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available