Which Three-Dimensional Printing Technology Can Replace Conventional Manual Method of Manufacturing Oral Appliance? A Preliminary Comparative Study of Physical and Mechanical Properties

Three-dimensional printing technology is widely being adopted in the manufacturing of oral appliances. The purpose of this study was to determine the most suitable method of manufacturing oral appliances by comparing the physical and mechanical properties of various 3D printing methods with the conventional method. Experimental groups consisted of six 3D-printed specimens via FDM, two polyjets, SLS, SLA, and DLP, and the milling methods. The control group consisted of an acrylic resin specimen made by the conventional manual method. The water absorption and solubility, color stability, flexural strength, and surface hardness were tested and statistically analyzed. The FDM, SLS, and DLP methods exhibited comparable water absorption and solubility with the control group, and only the SLA method exhibited significantly higher water solubility than the control group. In terms of the color stability, only the milling method met the requirements of the allowable clinical range. The FDM, SLA, and DLP methods exhibited comparable flexural strength with the control group. The surface hardness of the PJ-2, DLP, and milling methods was acceptable for replacing conventional manual method. Therefore, the most suitable method of manufacturing oral appliances among the experimental groups was the DLP method in terms of its water absorption and solubility, flexural strength, and surface hardness.

Automated summary

This study aimed to compare the suitability of different 3D printing methods and the conventional method in the manufacturing of oral appliances. The results showed that the DLP method was the most suitable for manufacturing oral appliances in terms of water absorption and solubility, flexural strength, and surface hardness.