4.6 Article

The Role of Nutritional Habits and Moderate Red Wine Consumption in PON1 Status in Healthy Population

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11209503

Keywords

PON1; red wine; PON1 genotypes; AREase activity; phenolic compounds; UPLC-MS

Funding

  1. Strengthening Research [UAN-2018]
  2. CONACyT [SSA/IMSS/ISSSTE-233745]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary intake, red wine consumption, and PON1 genotypes on the specific activity of PON1 in a healthy population. Results showed a significant increase in PON1 specific AREase activity after red wine consumption, suggesting a beneficial effect on this healthy Mexican population.
Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) plays a role as antioxidant on HDL. Including in diet additionally ingest of polyphenolic compounds can stimulate PON1 transcription and increase its activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary intake, red wine consumption, and PON1 genotypes (Q192R, L55M and C-108T) on the specific activity of PON1 in a healthy population. A descriptive and analytical pilot study was conducted in Mexican volunteers clinically healthy (n = 45) aged from 21-59 years. Over 6 weeks, the study participants ingested 120 mL of red wine per day. PON1 concentration, PON1 activities, genetic polymorphisms and dietary intake were evaluated. The preliminary fingerprinting of the wine was determined to corroborate the presence of phenolic compounds such as tannins and gallotannins. Neither dietary intake nor PON1 genotypes showed an effect on the specific activity of PON1. However, a significant increase in specific AREase activity after red wine consumption period was observed in the study participants. Our data suggest that the moderate consumption of red wine has a beneficial effect on PON1 specific AREase activity in this healthy Mexican population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available