4.6 Article

Aroma Profiles of Dry-Hopped Ciders Produced with Citra, Galaxy, and Mosaic Hops

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12010310

Keywords

cider; dry hopping; gas chromatography; mass spectrometry; solid phase microextraction; volatiles

Funding

  1. Society for the Analytical Chemists of Pittsburgh (SACP)
  2. American Society for Mass Spectrometry Research at PUIs Award by Agilent Technologies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study monitored the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in cider production and revealed the influence of lees resting and dry hopping on cider aroma. The findings suggest that different hop varieties and processing steps significantly alter the identity and concentration of aroma-important VOCs in dry-hopped cider.
Cider quality and consumer acceptance are greatly influenced by its aroma. With the continued expansion of the craft cider industry, cider producers are employing techniques such as dry hopping to develop unique flavor profiles. Few studies, however, have explored the VOCs of dry-hopped cider. Herein, we monitor the development of VOCs from pressed apple juice, through fermentation and dry hopping by HS-SPME-GC-MS, to elucidate when and how aroma compounds arise in cider production. In all, 89 VOCs were detected, spanning eight classes of organic compounds. Racking events decreased ester concentrations by 10 +/- 1%, but resting on the lees allowed these pleasant, fruity aromas to be reestablished. Dry hopping was conducted with three types of hops (Citra, Galaxy, and Mosaic). The varied development of terpenes and esters between hop varieties supports the use of this technique to diversify the aroma profiles of ciders. Herein, we report that both the variety of hops and the timing of key processing steps including racking and hop addition significantly alter the identity and concentration of aroma-important VOCs in dry-hopped cider.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available