4.6 Article

Stress Analysis in Damaged Pipeline with Composite Coating

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app112210676

Keywords

pipeline; composite coating; crack; stress intensity factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the distribution of stresses near damage in the form of axial surface cracks in a pipeline reinforced with a spiral-wound composite coating. The authors utilized the homogenization method and the finite element method to analyze the effective elastic characteristics and solve the deformation problem, respectively. Results show that the stress state of the coated intact pipe under pressure is influenced by the geometry of the capacity strip and the component composition of the heterogeneous coating.
This paper studied the distribution of stresses near damage in the form of axial surface cracks in a pipeline reinforced with a spiral-wound composite coating. The authors applied the homogenization method to determine the effective elastic characteristics of a structurally anisotropic layered package. By means of the classical momentless theory of shells, it was established that the stress state of the coated intact pipe under the pressure of the pumped product depends on the parameters of the geometry of the capacity strip, as well as on the component composition of the heterogeneous coating. The finite element method was applied to solve the problem of plane deformation of a piecewise homogeneous ring with an internal crack perpendicular to the interface. This problem assumes the linearity of the materials and the ideal mechanical contact with the layers. The effect of the composite coating and the size of the damage on the magnitudes of the energy flow into the crack tip, and on the stress intensity factor, was studied in detail. Various variants of the coating were considered, namely, winding of the coating on an unloaded pipe and reinforcement of the pipe under repair pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available