4.8 Article

Ionically Conductive Tunnels in h-WO3 Enable High-Rate NH4+ Storage

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105158

Keywords

energy storage; ionic tunnels; NH4+; WO3

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62174085, 52102264, 22001081, 21805136]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200826]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [20KJB430018]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Organic Electronics and Information Displays

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared to metallic ion charge carriers, nonmetallic charge carriers have faster kinetics and high-rate capability. However, the hosts for nonmetallic charge carriers are limited. This research suggests that mixed ionic-electronic conductors can serve as a promising host for NH4+ storage.
Compared to the commonly applied metallic ion charge carriers (e.g., Li+ and Na+), batteries using nonmetallic charge carriers (e.g., H+ and NH4+) generally have much faster kinetics and high-rate capability thanks to the small hydrated ionic sizes and nondiffusion control topochemistry. However, the hosts for nonmetallic charge carriers are still limited. In this work, it is suggested that mixed ionic-electronic conductors can serve as a promising host for NH4+ storage. Using hexagonal tungsten oxide (h-WO3) as an example, it is shown that the existence of ionic conductive tunnels greatly promotes the high-rate NH4+ storage. Specifically, a much higher capacity of 82 mAh g(-1) at 1 A g(-1) is achieved on h-WO3, in sharp contrast to 14 mAh g(-1) of monoclinic tungsten oxide (m-WO3). In addition, unlike layered materials, the insertion and desertion of NH4+ ions are confined within the tunnels of the h-WO3, which minimizes the damage to the crystal structure. This leads to outstanding stability of up to 200 000 cycles with 68% capacity retention at a high current of 20 A g(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available