4.8 Review

Recent Progress in Active Mechanical Metamaterials and Construction Principles

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202102662

Keywords

active mechanical metamaterials; construction principles; engineering applications; multi functions; stimuli-responsive materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active mechanical metamaterials combine mechanical metamaterials with smart materials for superior performance, with structures designed based on principles such as phase transition and strain mismatch. External stimuli like temperature, chemicals, and light are used for control and efficiency.
Active mechanical metamaterials (AMMs) (or smart mechanical metamaterials) that combine the configurations of mechanical metamaterials and the active control of stimuli-responsive materials have been widely investigated in recent decades. The elaborate artificial microstructures of mechanical metamaterials and the stimulus response characteristics of smart materials both contribute to AMMs, making them achieve excellent properties beyond the conventional metamaterials. The micro and macro structures of the AMMs are designed based on structural construction principles such as, phase transition, strain mismatch, and mechanical instability. Considering the controllability and efficiency of the stimuli-responsive materials, physical fields such as, the temperature, chemicals, light, electric current, magnetic field, and pressure have been adopted as the external stimuli in practice. In this paper, the frontier works and the latest progress in AMMs from the aspects of the mechanics and materials are reviewed. The functions and engineering applications of the AMMs are also discussed. Finally, existing issues and future perspectives in this field are briefly described. This review is expected to provide the basis and inspiration for the follow-up research on AMMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available