4.8 Review

Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to CO over Transition Metal/N-Doped Carbon Catalysts: The Active Sites and Reaction Mechanism

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202102886

Keywords

carbon-based materials; carbon monoxide; CO2 reduction; single-atom catalysts

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019JQ03015]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42075169, U1810209]
  3. Beijing Municipal Education Commission through the Innovative Transdisciplinary Program Ecological Restoration Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical CO2 reduction to CO using transition metal/N-doped carbon catalysts, especially Ni and Fe-N-C, shows great potential for large-scale production. The regulation of active sites in the catalysts can adjust the electrocatalytic performance for CO2 reduction.
Electrochemical CO2 reduction to value-added chemicals/fuels provides a promising way to mitigate CO2 emission and alleviate energy shortage. CO2-to-CO conversion involves only two-electron/proton transfer and thus is kinetically fast. Among the various developed CO2-to-CO reduction electrocatalysts, transition metal/N-doped carbon (M-N-C) catalysts are attractive due to their low cost and high activity. In this work, recent progress on the development of M-N-C catalysts for electrochemical CO2-to-CO conversion is reviewed in detail. The regulation of the active sites in M-N-C catalysts and their related adjustable electrocatalytic CO2 reduction performance is discussed. A visual performance comparison of M-N-C catalysts for CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) reported over the recent years is given, which suggests that Ni and Fe-N-C catalysts are the most promising candidates for large-scale reduction of CO2 to produce CO. Finally, outlooks and challenges are proposed for future research of CO2-to-CO conversion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available