3.8 Article

Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Composite Hydrogel Bioinks for the Development of 3D Bioprinted Head and Neck in Vitro Tumor Models

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 5288-5300

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00812

Keywords

Bioprinting; Decellularized Extracellular Matrix; Tissue Engineering; Biofabrication; In Vitro Disease Models; Tumor Microenvironment

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council [NSERC RGPIN-06671-14]
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  3. Townshend-Lamarre Family Foundation
  4. McGill University
  5. CONACYT-I2T2 [751540, 754427]
  6. McGill Engineering Doctoral Award [90025]
  7. FRQNT [288490, 291010, 258421]
  8. Ministry of Higher Education in Egypt
  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [119585]
  10. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [05247, RGPIN/05843-2014, EQPEQ/472339-2015]
  11. MJW Kim research fund
  12. CONACYT [291168, 291258]
  13. China Scholarship Council [201403170354]
  14. Research Project Funding of National University of Defense Technology [ZK19-33]
  15. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 DC 018577-01, DC 005788-15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composite material containing alginate and gelatin impart mechanical integrity to the biologically active decellularized ECM, resulting in a reinforced gel that is mechanically stable, bioprintable, and mimics tumor microenvironment characteristics. The cell-laden model generated using this hydrogel is highly reproducible, supports cell viability, and enables the production of spheroids with cross-sectional areas comparable to HNSCC tumors. This in vitro model system allows for evaluating the effectiveness of small molecule therapeutics for HNSCC treatment and shows increased resistance compared to traditional monolayer cultures.
Reinforced extracellular matrix (ECM)-based hydrogels recapitulate several mechanical and biochemical features found in the tumor microenvironment (TME) in vivo. While these gels retain several critical structural and bioactive molecules that promote cell-matrix interactivity, their mechanical properties tend toward the viscous regime limiting their ability to retain ordered structural characteristics when considered as architectured scaffolds. To overcome this limitation characteristic of pure ECM hydrogels, we present a composite material containing alginate, a seaweed-derived polysaccharide, and gelatin, denatured collagen, as rheological modifiers which impart mechanical integrity to the biologically active decellularized ECM (dECM). After an optimization process, the reinforced gel proposed is mechanically stable and bioprintable and has a stiffness within the expected physiological values. Our hydrogel's elastic modulus has no significant difference when compared to tumors induced in preclinical xenograft head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) mouse models. The bioprinted cell-laden model is highly reproducible and allows proliferation and reorganization of HNSCC cells while maintaining cell viability above 90% for periods of nearly 3 weeks. Cells encapsulated in our bioink produce spheroids of at least 3000 mu m(2) of cross-sectional area by day 15 of culture and are positive for cytokeratin in immunofluorescence quantification, a common marker of HNSCC model validation in 2D and 3D models. We use this in vitro model system to evaluate the standard-of-care small molecule therapeutics used to treat HNSCC clinically and report a 4-fold increase in the IC50 of cisplatin and an 80-fold increase for 5-fluorouracil compared to monolayer cultures. Our work suggests that fabricating in vitro models using reinforced dECM provides a physiologically relevant system to evaluate malignant neoplastic phenomena in vitro due to the physical and biological features replicated from the source tissue microenvironment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available