4.6 Review

A review of starch biosynthesis in cereal crops and its potential breeding applications in rice (Oryza Sativa L.)

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12678

Keywords

Starch biosynthesis; Endosperm; Regulator; Cereals

Funding

  1. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202105]
  2. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology [20200104]
  3. National Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501288]
  4. Anhui Province Natural Science Foundation of China [1908085QC103]
  5. Chinese 863 Program [2014AA10A604-15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review summarizes the regulatory signaling pathways of leaf starch biosynthesis, focuses on how transcription factors systematically respond to stimuli through enzyme regulation during starch biosynthesis, and proposes strategies to improve cereal yield and quality based on previous reports.
Starch provides primary storage of carbohydrates, accounting for approximately 85% of the dry weight of cereal endosperm. Cereal seeds contribute to maximum annual starch production and provide the primary food for humans and livestock worldwide. However, the growing demand for starch in food and industry and the increasing loss of arable land with urbanization emphasizes the urgency to understand starch biosynthesis and its regulation. Here, we first summarized the regulatory signaling pathways about leaf starch biosynthesis. Subsequently, we paid more attention to how transcriptional factors (TFs) systematically respond to various stimulants via the regulation of the enzymes during starch biosynthesis. Finally, some strategies to improve cereal yield and quality were put forward based on the previous reports. This review would collectively help to design future studies on starch biosynthesis in cereal crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available