4.7 Review

Methods for Measuring Thermal Conductivity of Two-Dimensional Materials: A Review

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12040589

Keywords

2D materials; thermal conductivity; molecular dynamics; Raman spectroscopy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005367]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFC2004600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the theoretical and experimental methods for evaluating the thermal conductivity of 2D materials and discusses the factors affecting the thermal conductivity. It is of great significance for guiding the application of 2D materials in micro/nanodevices.
Two-dimensional (2D) materials are widely used in microelectronic devices due to their excellent optical, electrical, and mechanical properties. The performance and reliability of microelectronic devices based 2D materials are affected by heat dissipation performance, which can be evaluated by studying the thermal conductivity of 2D materials. Currently, many theoretical and experimental methods have been developed to characterize the thermal conductivity of 2D materials. In this paper, firstly, typical theoretical methods, such as molecular dynamics, phonon Boltzmann transport equation, and atomic Green's function method, are introduced and compared. Then, experimental methods, such as suspended micro-bridge, 3 omega, time-domain thermal reflectance and Raman methods, are systematically and critically reviewed. In addition, the physical factors affecting the thermal conductivity of 2D materials are discussed. At last, future prospects for both theoretical and experimental thermal conductivity characterization of 2D materials is given. This paper provides an in-depth understanding of the existing thermal conductivity measurement methods of 2D materials, which has guiding significance for the application of 2D materials in micro/nanodevices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available