4.7 Article

Structural Investigation of the Synthesized Few-Layer Graphene from Coal under Microwave

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12010057

Keywords

few-layer graphene; coal; Raman spectroscopy; catalyst; microwave

Funding

  1. University of Newcastle, Australia [G-1010643]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on synthesizing few-layer graphene (FLG) from bituminous coal through a catalytic process under microwave heat treatment. The research indicated that the catalyst percentages affected the structural change of FLG composite materials, and the catalyst loaded samples showed homogeneous distribution and indicated few-layer graphene sheets.
This study focused on the structural investigation of few-layer graphene (FLG) synthesis from bituminous coal through a catalytic process under microwave heat treatment (MW). The produced FLG has been examined by Raman spectroscopy, XRD, TEM, and AFM. Coal was activated using the potassium hydroxide activation process. The FLG synthesis processing duration was much faster requiring only 20 min under the microwave radiation. To analyse few-layer graphene samples, we considered the three bands, i.e., D, G, and 2D, of Raman spectra. At 1300 degrees C, the P10% Fe sample resulted in fewer defects than the other catalyst percentages sample. The catalyst percentages affected the structural change of the FLG composite materials. In addition, the Raman mapping showed that the catalyst loaded sample was homogeneously distributed and indicated a few-layer graphene sheet. In addition, the AFM technique measured the FLG thickness around 4.5 nm. Furthermore, the HRTEM images of the P10% Fe sample contained a unique morphology with 2-7 graphitic layers of graphene thin sheets. This research reported the structural revolution with latent feasibility of FLG synthesis from bituminous coal in a wide range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available