4.7 Article

Evaporation of Methylammonium Iodide in Thermal Deposition of MAPbI3

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11102532

Keywords

methylammonium iodide; thermal evaporation; residual gas analyzer; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; morphology

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1903962]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research found that residual water vapor during the thermal evaporation of MAPbI(3) affects the decomposition of MAI and the quality of the film. An evaporation environment with water vapor pressure below 10(-8) Torr is required to fabricate high quality perovskite films.
Thermal evaporation is an important technique for fabricating methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI(3)), but the process is complicated by the need to co-evaporate methylammonium iodide (MAI) and PbI2. In this work, the effect of water vapor during the thermal deposition of MAPbI(3) was investigated under high vacuum. The evaporation process was monitored with a residual gas analyzer (RGA), and the film quality was examined with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The investigations showed that during evaporation, MAI decomposed while PbI2 evaporated as a whole compound. It was found that the residual water vapor reacted with one of the MAI-dissociated products. The higher iodine ratio suggests that the real MAI flux was higher than the reading from the QCM. The XPS analysis demonstrated that the residual water vapor may alter the elemental ratios of C, N, and I in thermally deposited MAPbI(3). Morphologic properties were investigated with atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). It was observed that a sample grown with high water vapor pressure had a roughened surface and poor film quality. Therefore, an evaporation environment with water vapor pressure below 10(-8) Torr is needed to fabricate high quality perovskite films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available