4.7 Article

Boiling Heat Transfer Evaluation in Nanoporous Surface Coatings

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11123383

Keywords

boiling heat transfer; nanoporous coating; deep learning

Funding

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/162]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [108-2221-E-009-058-MY3, 109-2622-E-009-015]
  3. Innovative UK
  4. Academy of Medical Sciences [60558, 62327]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents a deep learning method for predicting boiling heat transfer coefficient of nanoporous coated surfaces, which is applicable to various substrates and coating materials.
The present study develops a deep learning method for predicting the boiling heat transfer coefficient (HTC) of nanoporous coated surfaces. Nanoporous coated surfaces have been used extensively over the years to improve the performance of the boiling process. Despite the large amount of experimental data on pool boiling of coated nanoporous surfaces, precise mathematicalempirical approaches have not been developed to estimate the HTC. The proposed method is able to cope with the complex nature of the boiling of nanoporous surfaces with different working fluids with completely different thermophysical properties. The proposed deep learning method is applicable to a wide variety of substrates and coating materials manufactured by various manufacturing processes. The analysis of the correlation matrix confirms that the pore diameter, the thermal conductivity of the substrate, the heat flow, and the thermophysical properties of the working fluids are the most important independent variable parameters estimation under consideration. Several deep neural networks are designed and evaluated to find the optimized model with respect to its prediction accuracy using experimental data (1042 points). The best model could assess the HTC with an R-2 = 0.998 and (mean absolute error) MAE% = 1.94.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available