4.7 Review

Hetero-Element-Doped Molybdenum Oxide Materials for Energy Storage Systems

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11123302

Keywords

molybdenum oxides; hetero-element doping; energy storage materials

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0208000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22004112, 51902296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molybdenum oxide materials have a wide application in the field of energy storage, serving as electrode materials for various types of batteries. However, they face challenges such as volume expansion and capacity dropping, which can be addressed by doping with different elements to enhance performance.
In order to meet the growing demand for the electronics market, many new materials have been studied to replace traditional electrode materials for energy storage systems. Molybdenum oxide materials are electrode materials with higher theoretical capacity than graphene, which was originally used as anode electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. In subsequent studies, they have a wider application in the field of energy storage, such as being used as cathodes or anodes for other ion batteries (sodium-ion batteries, potassium-ion batteries, etc.), and electrode materials for supercapacitors. However, molybdenum oxide materials have serious volume expansion concerns and irreversible capacity dropping during the cycles. To solve these problems, doping with different elements has become a suitable option, being an effective method that can change the crystal structure of the materials and improve the performances. Therefore, there are many research studies on metal element doping or non-metal doping molybdenum oxides. This paper summarizes the recent research on the application of hetero-element-doped molybdenum oxides in the field of energy storage, and it also provides some brief analysis and insights.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available