4.5 Article

Leaching of Rare Earth Elements from NdFeB Magnets without Mechanical Pretreatment by Sulfuric (H2SO4) and Hydrochloric (HCl) Acids

Journal

MINERALS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min11121374

Keywords

extractive metallurgy; recycling; rare earth elements; urban mining

Funding

  1. Wroclaw Research Center EIT+ within the project 'The Application of Nanotechnology in Advanced Materials-NanoMat' [POIG 01.01.02-02-002/08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simplified method for leaching rare earth elements from NdFeB magnets was investigated, allowing selective leaching of NdFeB while leaving nickel in a solid state. The use of hydrochloric and sulfuric acids as leaching agents can increase the concentration of rare earth ions in the obtained solutions.
A simplified approach for rare earth elements leaching from NdFeB (neodymium-iron-boron) magnets was investigated. The possibility of simplifying the magnet recycling process by excluding grinding, milling and oxidative roasting unit operations was studied. Attempts to skip the demagnetization step were also conducted by using whole, non-demagnetized magnets in the leaching process. The presented experiments were conducted to optimize the operating conditions with respect to the leaching agent and its concentration, leaching time, leaching temperature and the form of the feed material. The use of hydrochloric and sulfuric acids as the leaching agents allowed selective leaching of NdFeB magnets to be achieved while leaving nickel, which is covering the magnets, in a solid state. The application of higher leaching temperatures (40 and 60 degrees C for sulfuric acid and 40 degrees C for hydrochloric acid) allowed us to shorten the leaching times. When using broken demagnetized magnets as the feed material, the resulting rare earth ion concentrations in the obtained solutions were significantly higher compared to using whole, non-demagnetized magnets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available