4.4 Article

Recording Gap Junction Current from Xenopus Oocytes

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 179, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/63361

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterologous expression of connexins and innexins in Xenopus oocytes is a powerful approach for studying the biophysical properties of gap junctions. However, it is technically challenging and requires technical modifications to make it more convenient and reliable.
Heterologous expression of connexins and innexins in Xenopus oocytes is a powerful approach for studying the biophysical properties of gap junctions (GJs). However, this approach is technically challenging because it requires a differential voltage clamp of two opposed oocytes sharing a common ground. Although a small number of labs have succeeded in performing this technique, essentially all of them have used either homemade amplifiers or commercial amplifiers that were designed for single-oocyte recordings. It is often challenging for other labs to implement this technique. Although a high side current measuring mode has been incorporated into a commercial amplifier for dual oocyte voltage-clamp recordings, there had been no report for its application until our recent study. We have made the high side current measuring approach more practical and convenient by introducing several technical modifications, including the construction of a magnetically based recording platform that allows precise placement of oocytes and various electrodes, use of the bath solution as a conductor in voltage differential electrodes, adoption of a commercial low-leakage KCI electrode as the reference electrode, fabrication of current and voltage electrodes from thin-wall glass capillaries, and positioning of all the electrodes using magnetically based devices. The method described here allows convenient and robust recordings of junctional current (Ij) between two opposed Xenopus oocytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available