4.2 Article

Reinforcement learning-based dynamic obstacle avoidance and integration of path planning

Journal

INTELLIGENT SERVICE ROBOTICS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 663-677

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11370-021-00387-2

Keywords

Mobile robot; Navigation; Collision avoidance; Reinforcement learning; Deep learning

Categories

Funding

  1. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) - Korea Government (MOTIE) [P0008473]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a framework for decentralized collision avoidance using deep reinforcement learning, where each agent can independently make decisions; the mobile robot agents learn how to avoid obstacles and reach target points in environments with irregularly moving dynamic obstacles to test the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Deep reinforcement learning has the advantage of being able to encode fairly complex behaviors by collecting and learning empirical information. In the current study, we have proposed a framework for reinforcement learning in decentralized collision avoidance where each agent independently makes its decision without communication with others. In an environment exposed to various kinds of dynamic obstacles with irregular movements, mobile robot agents could learn how to avoid obstacles and reach a target point efficiently. Moreover, a path planner was integrated with the reinforcement learning-based obstacle avoidance to solve the problem of not finding a path in a specific situation, thereby imposing path efficiency. The robots were trained about the policy of obstacle avoidance in environments where dynamic characteristics were considered with soft actor critic algorithm. The trained policy was implemented in the robot operating system (ROS), tested in virtual and real environments for the differential drive wheel robot to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method. Videos are available at .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available