4.6 Article

Mitochondrial Genomes Yield Insights into the Basal Lineages of Ichneumonid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13020218

Keywords

mitochondrial genome; gene rearrangement; ichneumonid wasps; Eucerotinae; Xoridinae; phylogeny

Funding

  1. Key International Joint Research Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [31920103005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070467]
  3. National Key Research and Development Plan [2017YFD0200101, 2019YFD0300104]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021FZZX001-31]
  5. Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province [2020C02003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed four insect genomes, providing insights into the phylogenetic relationships of Ichneumonidae species and the rearrangement patterns of tRNA.
We obtained four mitochondrial genomes of Odontocolon sp., Xorides funiuensis, Euceros kiushuensis and Euceros serricornis, which represent the first two representatives from subfamily Eucerotinae and Xoridinae (Ichneumonidae), respectively. All of the 4 newly sequenced mitochondrial genomes contain 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) and most 24 RNA genes. Furthermore, they all have novel tRNA rearrangement patterns comparing with published mitogenomes in Ichneumonidae. For the tRNA cluster trnI-trnQ-trnM, X. funiuensis is shuffled as trnM-trnI-trnQ with trnQ inversed, while Odontocolon sp. with a remote translocation of trnK, shuffling as trnI-trnM-trnQ. E. kiushuensis and E. serricornis shared the same cluster trnQ-trnY-trnW-trnC. Finally, we reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships among the sequenced subfamilies of Ichneumonidae based on nucleotides and amino acids sequences of 13 PCGs in mitochondrial genomes, and the results of both the maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses highly support that Eucerotinae is the basal ichneumonid lineage rather than Xoridinae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available