4.7 Article

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Attenuates Acute Skeletal Muscle Injury Induced by Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rats

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.756997

Keywords

ischemia reperfusion; remote organs; vagus nerve stimulation; hepatic injury; skeletal muscle injury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vagus nerve stimulation can alleviate acute skeletal muscle injury induced by hepatic I/R injury by suppressing inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, potentially via the SIRT1 pathway.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has a protective effect on distal organ injury after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. We aimed to investigate the protective efficacy of VNS on hepatic I/R injury-induced acute skeletal muscle injury and explore its underlying mechanisms. To test this hypothesis, male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: sham group (sham operation, n = 6); I/R group (hepatic I/R with sham VNS, n = 6); and VNS group (hepatic I/R with VNS, n = 6). A hepatic I/R injury model was prepared by inducing hepatic ischemia for 1 h (70%) followed by hepatic reperfusion for 6 h. VNS was performed during the entire hepatic I/R process. Tissue and blood samples were collected at the end of the experiment for biochemical assays, molecular biological preparations, and histological examination. Our results showed that throughout the hepatic I/R process, VNS significantly reduced inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, while significantly increasing the protein levels of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) and decreasing the levels of acetylated forkhead box O1 and Ac-p53, in the skeletal muscle. These data suggest that VNS can alleviate hepatic I/R injury-induced acute skeletal muscle injury by suppressing inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, potentially via the SIRT1 pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available