Journal
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.724007
Keywords
audiology; hearing loss; loudness; binaural processing; speech perception; spectro-temporal resolution; auditory profile
Categories
Funding
- Innovation Fund Denmark Grand Solutions [5164-00011B]
- Oticon
- GN Resound
- Widex
- Aalborg University
- University of Southern Denmark
- Technical University of Denmark
- Force Technology
- Aalborg University Hospital
- Odense University Hospital
- Copenhagen University Hospital
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The BEAR project aims to provide a new clinical profiling tool for hearing loss characterization, with evidence of different auditory profiles existing. Through multiple tests, individual hearing differences were revealed, showing potential application in clinical settings.
The Better hEAring Rehabilitation (BEAR) project aims to provide a new clinical profiling tool-a test battery-for hearing loss characterization. Although the loss of sensitivity can be efficiently measured using pure-tone audiometry, the assessment of supra-threshold hearing deficits remains a challenge. In contrast to the classical attenuation-distortion model, the proposed BEAR approach is based on the hypothesis that the hearing abilities of a given listener can be characterized along two dimensions, reflecting independent types of perceptual deficits (distortions). A data-driven approach provided evidence for the existence of different auditory profiles with different degrees of distortions. Ten tests were included in a test battery, based on their clinical feasibility, time efficiency, and related evidence from the literature. The tests were divided into six categories: audibility, speech perception, binaural processing abilities, loudness perception, spectro-temporal modulation sensitivity, and spectro-temporal resolution. Seventy-five listeners with symmetric, mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss were selected from a clinical population. The analysis of the results showed interrelations among outcomes related to high-frequency processing and outcome measures related to low-frequency processing abilities. The results showed the ability of the tests to reveal differences among individuals and their potential use in clinical settings.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available