4.2 Article

Small-scale topographic irregularities on Phobos: image and numerical analyses for MMX mission

Journal

EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-021-01463-8

Keywords

MMX; Phobos; Deimos; Landing; Topography; Roughness

Funding

  1. CNES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By studying high-resolution images of Phobos, we found significant variations in surface irregularities, but there is a high probability of finding smooth landing spots in larger areas on the surface.
The mothership of the Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) will perform the first landing and sampling on the surface of Phobos. For the safe landing, the 2.1-m-wide mothership of the MMX should find a smooth surface with at most 40 cm topographic irregularity, however, whose abundance or even existence is not guaranteed based on current knowledge. We studied the highest resolution (a few meters per pixel) images of Phobos for possible topographic irregularities in terms of boulder (positive relief feature) and crater distributions. We find that the spatial number densities of positive relief features and craters can vary significantly, indicating that the surface irregularities vary significantly over the entire surface. We extrapolate the size-frequency distributions of positive relief features to evaluate the surface roughness below the image resolution limit. We find that the probabilities that topographic irregularities are <40 cm for the areas of 4 x 4 m and 20 x 20 m are >33% and <1% for boulder-rich areas and > 88% and > 13% for boulder-poor areas, respectively, even for the worst-case estimates. The estimated probabilities largely increase when we reduce the assumed number of positive relief features, which are more realistic cases. These indicate high probabilities of finding a smooth enough place to land on Phobos'surface safely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available