4.6 Article

Influence of Substrate Concentration on Kinetic Parameters of Ethanol Dehydration in MFI and CHA Zeolites and Relation of These Kinetic Parameters to Acid-Base Properties

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12010051

Keywords

chabazite; MFI; zeolite acid-base properties; ethanol dehydration; substrate clustering; temperature programmed surface reaction

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation GA CR [19-19542S]
  2. University of Pardubice [SGS_2021_006]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LM2018103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides important information on the relationship between the amount of ethanol in zeolite lattice and the activation energy values of H/D exchange, which is a measure of the acid-base properties of zeolites, and their catalytic activity.
The catalytic activity of zeolites is often related to their acid-base properties. In this work, the relationship between the value of apparent activation energy of ethanol dehydration, measured in a fixed bed reactor and by means of a temperature-programmed surface reaction (TPSR) depending on the amount of ethanol in the zeolite lattice and the value of activation energy of H/D exchange as a measure of acid-base properties of MFI and CHA zeolites, was studied. Tests in a fixed bed reactor were unable to provide reliable reaction kinetics data due to internal diffusion limitations and rapid catalyst deactivation. Only the TPSR method was able to provide activation energy values comparable to the activation energy values obtained from the H/D exchange rate measurements. In addition, for CHA zeolite, it has been shown that the values of ethanol dehydration activation energies depend on the amount of ethanol in the CHA framework, and this effect can be attributed to the substrate clustering effects supporting the deprotonation of zeolite Bronsted centers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available