4.6 Article

Production of Amorphous Silicon Dioxide Derived from Aluminum Fluoride Industrial Waste and Consideration of the Possibility of Its Use as Al2O3-SiO2 Catalyst Supports

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12020162

Keywords

silica gel; amorphous silicon dioxide; aluminum fluoride; electron scanning microscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method for producing pure amorphous silicon dioxide and studies its application in the preparation of catalyst supports. Agglomerates of spherical silicon dioxide particles with a diameter of up to 1 μm were obtained by purifying silica gel.
This paper presents the results of the study on the development of a methodology for the production of pure amorphous silicon dioxide containing up to 99.8 wt.% of SiO2. As a starting material, a silica gel with a moisture content of up to 55 wt.% and an SiO2/AlF3 ratio of 4 was used. The silica gel was purified using alkaline and acidic solutions in concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 25 wt.%. The analysis of the experimental data allowed to identify the most suitable purification parameters of the starting material. The initial silica gel and the reaction products were studied using the methods of X-ray fluorescence, X-ray phase analysis, electron scanning microscopy, EDS microanalysis, and particle-size analysis. Amorphous silicon dioxide obtained according to the methodology developed by the authors forms agglomerates of spherical silicon dioxide particles up to 1 mu m in size. Amorphous silicon dioxide was involved in the preparation of catalyst supports in order to consider the possibility of replacing part of the expensive raw material in the form of aluminum hydroxide. In the work, the characteristics of the addition of this amorphous silicon dioxide and the supports obtained from the traditionally used raw materials were evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available