4.6 Article

Investigation on the Suitability of Engelhard Titanium Silicate as a Support for Ni-Catalysts in the Methanation Reaction

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11101225

Keywords

methanation; carbon dioxide; nickel; titanium silicate

Funding

  1. project PRIN 2017 DIRECTBIOPOWER for the development of innovative components for IT-SOFC [2017FCFYHK]
  2. Cooperation agreement CNR-DIITET
  3. UNIRC-DICEAM [WP3.LA3,7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposes a nickel catalyst impregnated onto a new support, ETS, for CO2 methanation reaction, achieving high CO2 conversion and CH4 selectivity; Ni/ETS-10 catalyst shows the best catalytic performance and is a promising catalyst for future CO2 methanation reaction.
Methanation reaction of carbon dioxide is currently envisaged as a facile solution for the storage and transportation of low-grade energies, contributing at the same time to the mitigation of CO2 emissions. In this work, a nickel catalyst impregnated onto a new support, Engelhard Titanium Silicates (ETS), is proposed, and its catalytic performance was tested toward the CO2 methanation reaction. Two types of ETS material were investigated, ETS-4 and ETS-10, that differ from each other in the titanium content, with Si/Ti around 2 and 3% by weight, respectively. Catalysts, loaded with 5% of nickel, were tested in the CO2 methanation reaction in the temperature range of 300-500 & DEG;C and were characterized by XRD, SEM-EDX, N-2 adsorption-desorption and H-2-TPR. Results showed an interesting catalytic activity of the Ni/ETS catalysts. Particularly, the best catalytic performances are showed by Ni/ETS-10: 68% CO2 conversion and 98% CH4 selectivity at T = 400 & DEG;C. The comparison of catalytic performance of Ni/ETS-10 with those obtained by other Ni-zeolites catalysts confirms that Ni/ETS-10 catalyst is a promising one for the CO2 methanation reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available