4.6 Review

Systematic review of neighborhood socioeconomic indices studied across the cancer control continuum

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 2125-2144

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4601

Keywords

cancer incidence; cancer mortality; cancer survival; health disparities; neighborhood deprivation index; socioeconomic status; systematic review

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI/NIH [P30CA06927]
  2. ACS [131618-MRSG-18-098-01-CPHPS]
  3. DOD [W81XWH-17-1-0276]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review identified and compared existing nSES indices studied across the cancer continuum, and highlighted the significant association between nSES and cancer outcomes. The direction of association varied by cancer site, race/ethnicity, and nSES index, indicating the complex relationship between nSES and cancer disparities.
Background There is extensive interest in understanding how neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) may affect cancer incidence or survival. However, variability regarding items included and approaches used to form a composite nSES index presents challenges in summarizing overall associations with cancer. Given recent calls for standardized measures of neighborhood sociodemographic effects in cancer disparity research, the objective of this systematic review was to identify and compare existing nSES indices studied across the cancer continuum (incidence, screening, diagnosis, treatment, survival/mortality) and summarize associations by race/ethnicity and cancer site to inform future cancer disparity studies. Methods Using PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2019 containing keywords related to nSES and cancer were identified in PubMed. Results Twenty-four nSES indices were identified from 75 studies. In general, findings indicated a significant association between nSES and cancer outcomes (n = 64/75 studies; 85.33%), with 42/64 (65.63%) adjusting for highly-correlated individual SES factors (e.g., education). However, the direction of association differed by cancer site, race/ethnicity, and nSES index. Conclusions This review highlights several methodologic and conceptual issues surrounding nSES measurement and potential associations with cancer disparities. Recommendations pertaining to the selection of nSES measures are provided, which may help inform disparity-related disease processes and improve the identification of vulnerable populations in need of intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available