4.6 Article

The impact of systematic assessment for adverse events on unscheduled hospital utilization in patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective multicenter study

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 705-714

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4476

Keywords

adverse event; chemotherapy; emergency room visit; hospitalization

Categories

Funding

  1. Korean Foundation for Cancer Research [CB-2017-B-2]
  2. Korean government (MSIT) [NRF-2019M3E5D4064636]
  3. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3E5D4064636] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that after the introduction of healthcare reimbursement for AE evaluation, patients had lower rates of ER visits and hospitalizations compared to the pre-reimbursement period, especially after the second chemotherapy cycle. The post-reimbursement group had higher rates of completing chemotherapy as planned and reported more AEs during cycle 1, which decreased significantly after cycle 2.
Background This study was conducted to compare the reported adverse event (AE) profiles and unexpected use of medical services during chemotherapy between before and after the healthcare reimbursement of AE evaluation in patients with cancer. Patients and Methods Using the electronic medical record database system, extracted patients with breast, lung, gastric, and colorectal cancers receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy between September 2013 and December 2016 at four centers in Korea were matched using the 1:1 greedy method: pre-reimbursement group (n = 1084) and post-reimbursement group (n = 1084). Unexpected outpatient department (OPD), emergency room (ER) visit, hospitalization rates, and chemotherapy completion rates were compared between the groups. Results The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. By chemotherapy cycle, hospitalization (1.8% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.039), and ER visit rates (3.3% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.064) were lower in the post-reimbursement group than that in the pre-reimbursement group. In particular, since cycle 2, ER visit and hospitalization rates were significantly lower in the post-reimbursement group than those in the pre-reimbursement group (2.6% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.020 and 1.4% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.007, respectively), although no significant differences were observed during cycle 1. The OPD visit rates were similar between both groups, regardless of cycles. The post-reimbursement group had a higher proportion of patients who completed chemotherapy as planned than the pre-reimbursement group (93.5% vs. 90.1%; p = 0.006). Post-reimbursement group had more AEs reported, including alopecia, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, and peripheral neuropathy, during cycle 1 than the pre-reimbursement group, which significantly decreased after cycle 2. Conclusion The introduction of healthcare reimbursement for AE evaluation may help physicians capture and appropriately manage AEs, consequently, decreasing hospital utilization and increasing chemotherapy completion rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available