4.3 Article

Sibling Comparison Studies

Journal

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-040120-024521

Keywords

between-within models; bias; causal inference; conditional effects; confounding; fixed effects models; marginal effects; random effects models; siblings; twins

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides an extensive overview of statistical analysis methods for sibling comparison studies and discusses various methodological challenges that arise in such studies.
Unmeasured confounding is one of the main sources of bias in observational studies. A popular way to reduce confounding bias is to use sibling comparisons, which implicitly adjust for several factors in the early environment or upbringing without requiring them to be measured or known. In this article we provide a broad exposition of the statistical analysis methods for sibling comparison studies. We further discuss a number of methodological challenges that arise in sibling comparison studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available