4.5 Article

Citizen science in cities: an overview of projects focused on urban Australia

Journal

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 741-752

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-021-01187-3

Keywords

Citizen science; Ecology; Urban; Cities; Biodiversity; Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Citizen science projects in Australia provide opportunities for urban residents to connect with the natural world and contribute to research on urban ecology and biodiversity. The current number and diversity of urban citizen science projects in Australia are relatively low, highlighting the need for further development and expansion to tap into a larger pool of potential participants.
Citizen science offers a unique opportunity to connect urban-dwellers with the often hidden natural world upon their doorsteps and to contribute to authentic research that increases knowledge of urban ecology and biodiversity. With the majority of Australia's population residing in large cities, this diverse potential pool of participants in science creates a significant opportunity to increase the spatial and temporal scale of research. Herein, we provide an overview of Australian urban citizen science projects based on an analysis of the projects listed in the Australian Citizen Science Association's Citizen Science Project Finder. We draw out key features (such as those with research questions specific to cities such as reintroduction and persistence of species in urban environments) from urban citizen science projects that make them suitable for the urban environment and use these features to suggest recommendations for further expansion and development of this important subset of projects. We conclude that the number and diversity of urban citizen science projects is relatively low in Australia, and advocate for an increase in initiatives that can tap into a large pool of potential participants for the benefit of science and society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available