Journal
TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01773-1
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- David Winston Turner Endowment Fund
- Wellcome [110049/Z/15/Z, 110049/Z/15/A]
- Wellcome Trust [110049/Z/15/A, 110049/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Compulsivity, which underlies multiple disorders, is still poorly understood. This study identified three stable and distinct subtypes of compulsivity using a heterogeneous sample and data-driven statistical modeling. These subtypes showed meaningful differences in mood, intolerance of uncertainty, urgency, and neurobiological measures.
Compulsivity is a poorly understood transdiagnostic construct thought to underlie multiple disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, addictions, and binge eating. Our current understanding of the causes of compulsive behavior remains primarily based on investigations into specific diagnostic categories or findings relying on one or two laboratory measures to explain complex phenotypic variance. This proof-of-concept study drew on a heterogeneous sample of community-based individuals (N = 45; 18-45 years; 25 female) exhibiting compulsive behavioral patterns in alcohol use, eating, cleaning, checking, or symmetry. Data-driven statistical modeling of multidimensional markers was utilized to identify homogeneous subtypes that were independent of traditional clinical phenomenology. Markers were based on well-defined measures of affective processing and included psychological assessment of compulsivity, behavioral avoidance, and stress, neurocognitive assessment of reward vs. punishment learning, and biological assessment of the cortisol awakening response. The neurobiological validity of the subtypes was assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Statistical modeling identified three stable, distinct subtypes of compulsivity and affective processing, which we labeled Compulsive Non-Avoidant, Compulsive Reactive and Compulsive Stressed. They differed meaningfully on validation measures of mood, intolerance of uncertainty, and urgency. Most importantly, subtypes captured neurobiological variance on amygdala-based resting-state functional connectivity, suggesting they were valid representations of underlying neurobiology and highlighting the relevance of emotion-related brain networks in compulsive behavior. Although independent larger samples are needed to confirm the stability of subtypes, these data offer an integrated understanding of how different systems may interact in compulsive behavior and provide new considerations for guiding tailored intervention decisions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available