4.6 Article

Performance Assessment and Comparison of Two Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters Developed for Pavement Application: Case Study

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14020863

Keywords

road engineering; energy harvesting; piezoelectric device; electrical performance; mechanical performance; electromechanical coupling performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51778477]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1600300]
  3. China Scholarship Council [202006260165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study designed and manufactured bridge-unit-based and pile-unit-based piezoelectric devices, and found that the pile structure device has higher elastic modulus and more reliable electrical performance compared to the bridge structure device, indicating better application prospects in road engineering.
To advance the development of piezoelectric energy harvesters, this study designed and manufactured bridge-unit-based and pile-unit-based piezoelectric devices. An indoor material testing system and accelerated pavement test equipment were used to test the electrical performance, mechanical performance, and electromechanical coupling performance of the devices. The results showed that the elastic modulus of the pile structure device was relatively higher than that of the bridge structure device. However, the elastic modulus of the two devices should be improved to avoid attenuation in the service performance and fatigue life caused by the stiffness difference. Furthermore, the electromechanical conversion coefficients of the two devices were smaller than 10% and insensitive to the load magnitude and load frequency. Moreover, the two devices can harvest 3.4 mW and 2.6 mW under the wheel load simulated by the one-third scale model mobile load simulator, thus meeting the supply requirements of low-power sensors. The elastic modulus, electromechanical conversion coefficients, and electric performance of the pile structure device were more reliable than those of the bridge structure device, indicating a better application prospect in road engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available