4.6 Article

Olive Mill Waste-Based Anaerobic Digestion as a Source of Local Renewable Energy and Nutrients

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14031402

Keywords

anaerobic digestion; biogas; olive cake; dairy manure; mesophilic; thermophilic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the renewable energy and digestate qualities produced from olive mill waste (OMW) treatment using anaerobic digestion (AD) at different temperatures and ratios with dairy manure (DM). The results showed that a mixture of OMW, DM, and inoculum (IN) at 55 degrees C produced the highest methane yield, and the concentration of the digestate also affected faba bean growth.
This study focused on what combination of anaerobic digestion (AD) temperature (ambient, mesophilic, and thermophilic) and olive mill waste (OMW) to dairy manure (DM) ratio mixture delivers the desired renewable energy and digestate qualities when using AD as olive mill waste treatment. OMW is widespread in the local environment in the North Sinai region, Egypt, which causes many environmental hazards if left without proper treatment. Three different mixtures consisting of OMW, dairy manure (DM), and inoculum (IN) were incubated under ambient, mesophilic, and thermophilic conditions for 45 days. The results showed that mixture B (2:1:2, OMW:DM:IN) at 55 degrees C produced more methane than at 35 degrees C and ambient temperature by 40% and 252%, respectively. Another aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the different concentrations of the digestate taken from each mixture on faba bean growth. The results showed that the maximum fresh weight values of the shoot system were observed at 10% and 15% for mixture B at ambient temperature. The best concentration value for the highest root elongation rate is a 5% addition of digestate mixture A at 55 degrees C, compared with other treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available