4.6 Review

MCDM-Based R&D Project Selection: A Systematic Literature Review

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su132111626

Keywords

research and development; portfolio management; decision support systems; multi-attribute decision making; systematic literature review

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) of Brazil
  2. Research Supporting Foundation of Minas Gerais State (FAPEMIG) of Brazil
  3. Sao Paulo Reaserch Foundation (FAPESP) of Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research and Development (R&D) Project Portfolio Selection (PPS) is a crucial strategic process for various companies, involving project selection methods, solving algorithms, and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Despite advancements, there is still room for a systematic literature review to understand standard practices and research opportunities in the field.
From small spin-offs deploying innovative software to big pharmaceutical complexes making vaccines, Research and Development (R&D) Project Portfolio Selection (PPS) is an essential strategic process for various companies. It was never easy to select a set of projects among many feasible possibilities, even for yesterday's paces. However, the world is rapidly changing, and so is R&D PPS. The portfolio objectives excel profit in the same manner that model constraints go beyond budget limitations. In parallel, project selection approaches and solving algorithms followed the increase of computational power. Despite all those changes, the importance of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods and the decision criteria used for R&D PPS, there is still room for a systematic literature review (SLR) for the topic. Thus, this paper offers an SLR of the existing literature from the half-century, 1970, and onward MCDM-based R&D PPS performed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection. We provide a comprehensive picture of this field, show how it is changing, and highlight standard practices and research opportunities in the area. We perform a broad classification of the MCDM methods, categorized by the nature of alternatives, types of integration approach, the MCDM method itself, and types of uncertainty, by the 66 studies in the SLR database. The portfolios' classification obeys the application domain and the number of projects. We have also explored all the 263 criteria found in the literature by grouping them according to experts from five Brazilian R&D organizations that together manage portfolios valued around US$ 5 billion a year, accounting for 38% of all Brazilian annual expenditure in R&D projects. We also include a bibliometric analysis of the considered papers and research opportunities highlighted or not explored by researchers. Given the increasing number of decision-making approaches and new technologies available, we hope to provide guidance on the topic and promote knowledge production and growth concerning the usage of MCDM methods and decision criteria in R&D PPS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available