4.6 Article

Do You Want Sustainable Olympics? Environment, Disaster, Gender, and the 2020 Tokyo Olympics

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su132212879

Keywords

COVID-19; 2020 Tokyo Olympics; compact Olympics; sustainability; environment; gender equality; gender difference; Japan

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The slogans of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics aimed to symbolize resilience from the Great East Japan Earthquake and promote gender equality and sustainability. However, the actual cost exceeded the budget and the games were overshadowed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most Japanese people support environmental protection, gender equality, and disaster prevention policies, and they wish to reduce public expenditure for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.
The slogans of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics were symbol of resilience from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Compact Olympics . The Olympics were also expected to demonstrate gender equality and to enhance sustainability in modern society. However, in practice, the cost of the Tokyo Olympics 2020 was far greater than estimated. The slogan was changed to symbol of overcoming COVID-19 although in reality, infection spread dramatically during the games. Overall, the 2020 Tokyo Olympics did not turn out as expected or meet the expectations of the populace. Using individual-level data, we tested how and to what extent Japanese proponents of a sustainable society supported the compact Olympics announced in 2016. The key findings are: (1) most people support policies for environmental protection, gender equality, and disaster prevention and (2) they would have wished to reduce public expenditure for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Further examination with a questionnaire yielded similar results for the male but not for the female sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available