4.6 Article

Durable Steel-Reinforced Concrete Structures for Marine Environments

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su132413695

Keywords

corrosion; steel; reinforcement; concrete; durability field observations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study case found that concrete structures reinforced with steel can display excellent long-term durability even in harsh conditions, but attention should be paid to ensure sufficient concrete compaction to prevent localized corrosion, and the use of blast furnace slag and other aggregates may contribute to enhancing the structure's durability.
Even in harsh marine environments, concrete structures reinforced with steel can show excellent long-term durability, with little or no reinforcement corrosion. Very few actual reinforced concrete (RC) structures have been closely scrutinized over many years and subject to interpretation using recent state-of-the-art understanding gained from detailed laboratory observations. Such a case is described for an 80-year-old RC structure observed annually over about 30 years in what is essentially an extraordinary long experiment. Despite very high chloride concentrations, field excavation evidence showed that reinforcement corrosion overall remains minimal, except where insufficient concrete compaction permitted air-voids to initiate quite severe, very localized corrosion even with still high concrete pH. It is possible that the use of blast furnace slag as aggregate may have assisted the observed durability. The case study supports other studies that show that it is possible to achieve long-term durable and therefore sustainable RC structures without additives and using only conventional reinforcement steels and conventional cements and aggregates. However, the potential dangers of deep narrow cracking extending to the reinforcement and the potentially deleterious effects of alkali-aggregate reactivity of some aggregates needs to be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available