4.6 Article

It Is a Balancing Act: The Interface of Scientific Evidence and Policy in Support of Effective Marine Environmental Management

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14031650

Keywords

marine management; evidence; science policy interface; UK; marine planning; advice; assessment

Funding

  1. Cefas [40101A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article reviews the fundamental aspects of effective marine management, emphasizing the role of science and scientific evidence in informing marine policy and decision making. Recommendations are made based on the analysis of current marine management practices in the UK, with a focus on four marine sectors. The importance of increasing data accessibility, hypothesis-driven environmental monitoring, and engaging with the public for a shared understanding and vision are highlighted.
The marine environment is a complex system, and with growing human demand, the sustainable use of multiple marine resources is continually challenged. The increasing complexity of overlapping marine activities causes pressures on the environment. Here, we review the fundamental aspects for effective marine management, particularly the role of science and scientific evidence to inform marine policy and decision making. The outcomes of internal expert workshops were used to analyse currently applied marine management practices in the UK using four marine sectors in English waters based on the expertise: environmental impact assessments; dredge and disposal operations; marine protected areas; and offshore renewable energy. Strengths, weaknesses, and commonalities between these sectors were assessed in terms of their effectiveness for marine management. Finally, we make recommendations based on the outputs to better inform effective yet sustainable marine management. The importance of increasing accessibility to data, hypothesis-driven environmental monitoring, streamlining funding opportunities and ensuring effective dissemination of data to ensure scientific outcomes and achieve increased robustness of assessments is emphasised. We also recommend that assessment drivers align with the outputs and approaches should be holistic and engage with the public to ensure a shared understanding and vision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available