4.6 Article

Social Innovation: Field Analysis and Gaps for Future Research

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14031153

Keywords

social innovation; social entrepreneurship; innovation; urban development; sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of scientific publications and interest in social innovation has grown significantly in the past decade, highlighting the need for further studies in this field. This study aimed to map the scientific publications and intellectual structure in the field of social innovation using a bibliometric approach. The results revealed explosive growth in academic literature on social innovation, and identified the main authors, articles, topics, institutions, and countries in this field.
Scientific publications on social innovation and interest in the subject have grown substantially in the last decade, evidencing the need for more studies in this direction. This study aimed to map the scientific publications and intellectual structure in the field of social innovation, through a bibliometric study. The bibliometric survey specifically considered the period 2006-2021, through data indexed by the SCOPUS database, which included journals with a high impact factor. A total of 1192 articles were analyzed using the software VOSviewer (VOS) 1.6.15, to graphically map the material. The results showed explosive growth in the academic literature on social innovation in the last decade; moreover, they allowed the identification of the main authors, articles, topics, institutions, and countries in the field. From the analyses, a theoretical framework structured with four main emphases (clusters) was evidenced: (1) social entrepreneurship and the third sector; (2) strategic management and innovation; (3) sociopolitical aspects, urban development, and governance; and (4) innovation and sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available