Journal
SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su132111754
Keywords
choice experiment; non-market valuation; willingness to pay; survey; wildfire economics; hazardous fuels; subjective risk
Funding
- Joint Fire Science Program [14-5-01-27]
- University of Alaska Fairbanks Resiliency and Adaptation Program
- University of Alaska Fairbanks School of Management
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study shows that residents are willing to pay more for private wildfire risk mitigation actions, which is positively associated with thinned fuel treatments on nearby public lands but may decrease if cleared fuel treatments are present on public lands.
Wildfire has become a larger threat to human life and property with the proliferation of homes into the wildland urban interface and warming climate. In this study we explored Alaskan homeowner preferences for wildfire risk mitigation in the wildland urban interface using discrete choice experiments to better understand the drivers of their risk mitigation actions. Estimates of willingness-to-pay for private mitigation actions are increased with wildfire risk reduction for all respondents. Willingness-to-pay for private mitigation is also positively associated with the presence of thinned fuel treatments on nearby public lands, but is estimated to decrease if cleared fuel treatments are present on public lands. Our study concludes that homeowners minimize wildfire risk while maintaining neighborhood amenity values. Additionally, findings suggest that there is an optimal amount of neighborhood participation to motivate individual risk mitigation actions, as well as having a say in the mitigation actions on public lands.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available