4.6 Article

Prediction of Daily Mean PM10 Concentrations Using Random Forest, CART Ensemble and Bagging Stacked by MARS

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14020798

Keywords

air pollution; machine learning; stacking; rotation ensemble; bagging; selective ensemble; diversity strategy

Funding

  1. Bulgarian National Science Fund (BNSF) [KP-06-IP-CHINA/1 (K?-06-??-K?TA?/1)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel framework based on machine learning was developed to predict the daily average concentrations of PM10 in Bulgaria. The framework used meteorological parameters as independent variables and built efficient predictive models to improve accuracy.
A novel framework for stacked regression based on machine learning was developed to predict the daily average concentrations of particulate matter (PM10), one of Bulgaria's primary health concerns. The measurements of nine meteorological parameters were introduced as independent variables. The goal was to carefully study a limited number of initial predictors and extract stochastic information from them to build an extended set of data that allowed the creation of highly efficient predictive models. Four base models using random forest, CART ensemble and bagging, and their rotation variants, were built and evaluated. The heterogeneity of these base models was achieved by introducing five types of diversities, including a new simplified selective ensemble algorithm. The predictions from the four base models were then used as predictors in multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models. All models were statistically tested using out-of-bag or with 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validation. In addition, a variable importance analysis was conducted. The proposed framework was used for short-term forecasting of out-of-sample data for seven days. It was shown that the stacked models outperformed all single base models. An index of agreement IA = 0.986 and a coefficient of determination of about 95% were achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available