4.5 Article

Nonequilibrium in Thermodynamic Formalism: The Second Law, Gases and Information Geometry

Journal

QUALITATIVE THEORY OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12346-021-00551-0

Keywords

Entropy; Ruelle operator; Thermodynamic formalism; Relative entropy; Nonequilibrium; Entropy production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relative entropy plays a significant role in nonequilibrium thermodynamics and information theory. By considering the action of the dual of the Ruelle operator, the interaction between equilibrium probabilities can be achieved, leading to nonequilibrium states that can be seen as thermodynamic operations.
In nonequilibrium thermodynamics and information theory, the relative entropy (or, KL divergence) plays a very important role. Consider a Holder Jacobian J and the Ruelle (transfer) operator L-log J. Two equilibrium probabilities mu(1) and mu(2), can interact via a discrete-time Thermodynamic Operation given by the action of the dual of the Ruelle operator L-log J*. We argue that the law mu -> L-log J* (mu), producing nonequilibrium, can be seen as a Thermodynamic Operation after showing that it's a manifestation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. We also show that the change of relative entropy satisfies D-K L(mu(1), mu(2)) - D-K L (L-log J* (mu(1)), L-log J* (mu(2))) = 0. Furthermore, we describe sufficient conditions on J, mu(1) for getting h (L-log J*(mu(1))) >= h(mu(1)), where h is entropy. Recalling a natural Riemannian metric in the Banach manifold of Holder equilibrium probabilities we exhibit the second-order Taylor formula for an infinitesimal tangent change of KL divergence; a crucial estimate in Information Geometry. We introduce concepts like heat, work, volume, pressure, and internal energy, which play here the role of the analogous ones in Thermodynamics of gases. We briefly describe the MaxEnt method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available