4.5 Article

Exploring sensory phenotypes in autism spectrum disorder

Journal

MOLECULAR AUTISM
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13229-021-00471-5

Keywords

Sensory processing; Sensory phenotypes; Cluster analysis; Autism spectrum disorder; Adaptive behaviour; Social communication; Restrictive and repetitive behaviours; ADHD traits; OCD traits

Funding

  1. Nichole Scheerer's BrainsCAN Postdoctoral Fellowship at Western University - Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF)
  2. NSERC Discovery Grant [RGPIN-201704656]
  3. SSHRC Insight Grant [435-2017-0936]
  4. University of Western Ontario Faculty Development Research Fund
  5. province of Ontario Early Researcher Award
  6. Canadian Foundation for Innovation John R. Evans Leaders Fund [37497]
  7. Masonic Foundation of Ontario
  8. Ontario Brain Institute (OBI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that sensory difficulties in autistic individuals can be clustered into five sensory phenotypes, and these phenotypes are associated with behavioral differences. Significant differences were found across age, adaptive behavior, and traits associated with autism, attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder, and obsessive and compulsive disorder among the different sensory phenotypes.
Background Atypical reactions to the sensory environment are often reported in autistic individuals, with a high degree of variability across the sensory modalities. These sensory differences have been shown to promote challenging behaviours and distress in autistic individuals and are predictive of other functions including motor, social, and cognitive abilities. Preliminary research suggests that specific sensory differences may cluster together within individuals creating discrete sensory phenotypes. However, the manner in which these sensory differences cluster, and whether the resulting phenotypes are associated with specific cognitive and social challenges is unclear. Methods Short sensory profile data from 599 autistic children and adults between the ages of 1 and 21 years were subjected to a K-means cluster analysis. Analysis of variances compared age, adaptive behaviour, and traits associated with autism, attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder, and obsessive and compulsive disorder across the resultant clusters. Results A five-cluster model was found to minimize error variance and produce five sensory phenotypes: (1) sensory adaptive, (2) generalized sensory differences, (3) taste and smell sensitivity, (4) under-responsive and sensation seeking, and (5) movement difficulties with low energy. Age, adaptive behaviour, and traits associated with autism, attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder, and obsessive and compulsive disorder were found to differ significantly across the five phenotypes. Limitations The results were based on parent-report measures of sensory processing, adaptive behaviour, traits associated with autism, attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder, and obsessive and compulsive disorder, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Further, not all measures are standardized, or psychometrically validated with an autism population. Autistic individuals with an intellectual disability were underrepresented in this sample. Further, as these data were obtained from established records from a large provincial database, not all measures were completed for all individuals. Conclusions These findings suggest that sensory difficulties in autistic individuals can be clustered into sensory phenotypes, and that these phenotypes are associated with behavioural differences. Given the large degree of heterogeneity in sensory difficulties seen in the autistic population, these sensory phenotypes represent an effective way to parse that heterogeneity and create phenotypes that may aid in the development of effective treatments and interventions for sensory difficulties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available