4.3 Article

A comparative analysis of L1 retrotransposition activities in human genomes suggests an ongoing increase in L1 number despite an evolutionary trend towards lower activity

Journal

MOBILE DNA
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13100-021-00255-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study used comparative methods to estimate parameters for the evolution of retrotransposition rates and inferred L1 dynamics. The results showed a positive correlation between new L1 emergence rates in the human population and cell-culture based retrotransposition activities, along with an evolutionary trend towards lower retrotransposition activity. However, this trend is insufficient to counterbalance the increase in active L1s resulting from continuing retrotransposition.
Background LINE-1 (Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements, L1) retrotransposons are the only autonomously active transposable elements in the human genome. The evolution of L1 retrotransposition rates and its implications for L1 dynamics are poorly understood. Retrotransposition rates are commonly measured in cell culture-based assays, but it is unclear how well these measurements provide insight into L1 population dynamics. This study applied comparative methods to estimate parameters for the evolution of retrotransposition rates, and infer L1 dynamics from these estimates. Results Our results show that the rates at which new L1s emerge in the human population correlate positively to cell-culture based retrotransposition activities, that there is an evolutionary trend towards lower retrotransposition activity, and that this evolutionary trend is not sufficient to counter-balance the increase in active L1s resulting from continuing retrotransposition. Conclusions Together, these findings support a model of the population-level L1 retrotransposition dynamics that is consistent with prior expectations and indicate the remaining gaps in the understanding of L1 dynamics in human genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available