4.6 Article

Activation Energy Impact on Flow of AA7072-AA7075/Water-Based Hybrid Nanofluid through a Cone, Wedge and Plate

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13020302

Keywords

hybrid nanofluid; porous medium; heat source/sink; cone; wedge and plate; activation energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effect of a heat source/sink on the flow of nanofluid through a cone, wedge, and plate. It was found that the heat transfer is improved when the fluid flows past a plate compared to a cone or wedge.
The present research investigates the effect of a heat source/sink on nanofluid flow through a cone, wedge, and plate when using a suspension of aluminium alloys (AA7072 and AA7075) as nanoparticles in base fluid water. The activation energy and porous material are also considered in the modelling. Using similarity transformations, the modelling equations were converted into an ordinary differential equation (ODEs) system. The Runge Kutta Fehlberg 45 fourth fifth-order (RKF 45) technique and shooting approach were used to numerically solve these equations. The influence of essential aspects on flow fields, heat, and mass transfer rates was studied and addressed using graphical representations. The outcome reveals that the case of fluid flow past a plate shows improved heat transfer for augmented heat source/sink parameter values than the cases for fluid flow past a cone and wedge does. Furthermore, we observed the least heat transfer for the case of fluid flow past the cone. The mass transfer for the case of fluid flow past the cone increased more slowly for growing activation energy parameter values than in the other cases. Moreover, we observed higher mass transfer rates for the case of fluid flow past the plate. The augmented values of the heat source/sink parameter decayed the heat transfer rate in all three flow cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available