4.6 Article

SPICE Implementation of the Dynamic Memdiode Model for Bipolar Resistive Switching Devices

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13020330

Keywords

memristor; resistive switching; memory; memdiode

Funding

  1. EMPIR programme
  2. European Union
  3. [20FUN06 MEMQuD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the fundamentals and SPICE implementation of the Dynamic Memdiode Model (DMM) for the conduction characteristics of bipolar-type resistive switching (RS) devices. The DMM represents a breakthrough in accurately simulating the RS phenomenon and allows for simple setting of initial memory condition and decoupled modeling.
This paper reports the fundamentals and the SPICE implementation of the Dynamic Memdiode Model (DMM) for the conduction characteristics of bipolar-type resistive switching (RS) devices. Following Prof. Chua's memristive devices theory, the memdiode model comprises two equations, one for the electron transport based on a heuristic extension of the quantum point-contact model for filamentary conduction in thin dielectrics and a second equation for the internal memory state related to the reversible displacement of atomic species within the oxide film. The DMM represents a breakthrough with respect to the previous Quasi-static Memdiode Model (QMM) since it describes the memory state of the device as a balance equation incorporating both the snapback and snapforward effects, features of utmost importance for the accurate and realistic simulation of the RS phenomenon. The DMM allows simple setting of the initial memory condition as well as decoupled modeling of the set and reset transitions. The model equations are implemented in the LTSpice simulator using an equivalent circuital approach with behavioral components and sources. The practical details of the model implementation and its modes of use are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available