4.6 Article

Synthesis and Characteristics of Double-Shell Mesoporous Hollow Silica Nanomaterials to Improve CO2 Adsorption Performance

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi12111424

Keywords

double-shell mesoporous hollow silica sphere; CO2 adsorption; high pore volume

Funding

  1. technology and commercialization program through INNOPOLIS Foundation - Ministry of Science and ICT [2021-DG-RD-0062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By synthesizing double-shell mesoporous hollow silica nanomaterial with excellent pore volume, the amine support capacity was increased, thereby improving the adsorption performance of carbon dioxide.
To improve the adsorption performance of carbon dioxide, which is considered the main culprit of greenhouse gases, the specific surface area and high pore volume of the adsorbing material should be considered. For a porous material, the performance of carbon dioxide adsorption is determined by the amine groups supporting capacity; the larger the pore volume, the greater the capacity to support the amine groups. In this study, a double-shell mesoporous hollow silica nanomaterial with excellent pore volume and therefore increased amine support capacity was synthesized. A core-shell structure capable of having a hollow shape was synthesized using polystyrene as a core material, and a double-shell mesoporous shape was synthesized by sequentially using two types of surfactants. The synthesized material was subjected to a sintering process of 600 degrees, and the N-2 sorption analysis confirmed a specific surface area of 690 m(2)/g and a pore volume of 1.012 cm(3)/g. Thereafter, the amine compound was impregnated into the silica nanomaterial, and then, a carbon dioxide adsorption experiment was conducted, which confirmed that compared to the mesoporous hollow silica nanomaterial synthesized as a single shell, the adsorption performance was improved by about 1.36 times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available