4.1 Article

Communication During Interhospital Transfers of Emergency General Surgery Patients: A Qualitative Study of Challenges and Opportunities

Journal

JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 711-716

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000979

Keywords

communication; interhospital transfers; emergency general surgery; tertiary care; qualitative study; interviews

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [K08 144-AAD5359-539714-4]
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Award program, through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [ULTR002373]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to understand the challenges to communication between referring and accepting providers transferring emergency general surgery (EGS) patients from the transfer center nurse's perspective. Transfer center nurses described challenges in terms of information completeness and appropriateness, efficiency of the conversation, and consensus. Opportunities for improvement include sharing appropriate and complete information, ensuring efficient communication, and reaching consensus about the course of action.
Objectives Transferred emergency general surgery (EGS) patients experience worse outcomes than directly admitted patients. Improving communication during transfers may improve patient care. We sought to understand the nature of and challenges to communication between referring (RP) and accepting (AP) providers transferring EGS patients from the transfer center nurse's (TCN) perspective. Methods Guided by the Relational Coordination Framework, we interviewed 17 TCNs at an academic medical center regarding (in)efficient and (in)effective communication between RPs and APs. In-person interviews were recorded, transcribed, and managed in NVivo. Four researchers developed a codebook, cocoded transcripts, and met regularly to build consensus and discuss emergent themes. We used data matrices to perform constant comparisons and arrive at higher-level concepts. Results Challenges to ideal communication centered on the appropriateness and completeness of information, efficiency of the conversation, and degree of consensus. Transfer center nurses described that RPs provided incomplete information because of a lack of necessary infrastructure, personnel, or technical knowledge; competing clinical demands; or a fear of the transfer request being rejected. Inefficient communication resulted from RPs being unfamiliar with the information APs expected and the lack of a structured process to share information. Communication also failed when providers disagreed about the necessity of the transfer. Accepting providers diffused tension and facilitated communication by embracing the role of a coach, negotiating wait-and-see agreements, and providing explanations of why transfers were unnecessary. Conclusions Transfer center nurses described numerous challenges to provider communication. Opportunities for improvement include sharing appropriate and complete information, ensuring efficient communication, and reaching consensus about the course of action.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available