4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Safety Attitude of Operating Room Personnel Associated With Accurate Completion of a Surgical Checklist: A Cross-sectional Observational Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 449-456

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000954

Keywords

checklist; guideline adherence; risk adjustment; surgical procedures; determinants; safety; World Health Organization

Funding

  1. Hospital Clinical Research Programme (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) 2010 of the French Ministry of Health (Ministere charge de la Sante, Direction de l'Hospitalisation et de l'Organisation des Soins)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the way the checklist is executed in routine practice may reflect the teamwork and safety climate in the operating room. The presence of a fully completed checklist in medical records was associated with higher safety attitudes among teams. Compliance with checklists can be considered as an indicator of the extent of safety in operating room practice.
Objective How the checklist is executed in routine practice may reflect the teamwork and safety climate in the operating room (OR). This cross-sectional study aimed to identify whether the presence of a fully completed checklist in medical records was associated with teams' safety attitudes. Methods Data from 29 French hospitals, including 5677 operated patients and 834 OR professionals, were prospectively collected. The degree of checklist compliance was categorized for each patient in 1 of 4 ways: full, incomplete, inaccurate, and no checklist completed. The members of OR teams were invited to complete a questionnaire including teamwork climate measurement (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire) and their opinion regarding checklist use, checklist audibly reading, and communication change with checklist. Multilevel modeling was performed to investigate the effect of variables related to hospitals and professionals on checklist compliance, after adjustment for patient characteristics. Results A checklist was present for 83% of patients, but only 35% demonstrated full completion. Compared with no checklist, full completion was associated with higher safety attitude (high teamwork climate [adjusted odds ratio for full completion, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-9.76]; communication change [1.31, 1.04-1.66]; checklist aloud reading [1.16, 1.02-1.32]) and was reinforced by the designation of a checklist coordinator (2.43, 1.06-5.55). Incomplete completion was also associated with enhanced safety attitude contrary to inaccurate completion. Conclusions Compliance with checklists is associated with safer OR team practice and can be considered as an indicator of the extent of safety in OR practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available