4.4 Article

Dispersion relation analysis of the radiative corrections to gA in the neutron β-decay

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2021)053

Keywords

Quark Masses and SM Parameters; Neutrino Physics

Funding

  1. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, STRONG-2020 project [824093]
  2. German-Mexican research collaboration Grant (CONACyT) [278017]
  3. German-Mexican research collaboration Grant (DFG) [SP 778/4-1]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [TRR110, 196253076 - TRR 110]
  5. NSFC [TRR110, 12070131001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we conducted the first complete dispersion relation analysis of the inner radiative corrections to the axial coupling constant g(A) in neutron beta-decay. By using experimental inputs, we determined the contribution from the gamma W-box diagram with a high precision. Our calculation showed that the inner radiative corrections to the Fermi and the Gamow-Teller matrix element in neutron beta-decay are nearly identical, and the ratio of the axial coupling constant remains almost unrenormalized.
We present the first and complete dispersion relation analysis of the inner radiative corrections to the axial coupling constant g(A) in the neutron beta-decay. Using experimental inputs from the elastic form factors and the spin-dependent structure function g(1), we determine the contribution from the gamma W-box diagram to a precision better than 10(-4). Our calculation indicates that the inner radiative corrections to the Fermi and the Gamow-Teller matrix element in the neutron beta-decay are almost identical, i.e. the ratio lambda = g(A)/g(V) is almost unrenormalized. With this result, we predict the bare axial coupling constant to be g(A) = -1.2754(13)(exp)(2)(RC) based on the PDG average lambda = -1.2756(13).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available