4.4 Article

Dark confinement and chiral phase transitions: gravitational waves vs matter representations

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2022)003

Keywords

Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Thermal Field Theory; Confinement; Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Research Council (STFC) [ST/T00102X/1]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2016-05996]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [668679]
  4. MIUR [2017L5W2PT]
  5. INFN grant STRONG
  6. STFC [ST/T00102X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the gravitational-wave signal from strongly coupled models featuring both dark chiral and confinement phase transitions. We find significant differences between the various representations in the analysis of gravitational-wave signals, with the two-index symmetric representation leading to the strongest first-order phase transition.
We study the gravitational-wave signal stemming from strongly coupled models featuring both, dark chiral and confinement phase transitions. We therefore identify strongly coupled theories that can feature a first-order phase transition. Employing the Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, we focus our attention on SU(3) Yang-Mills theories featuring fermions in fundamental, adjoint, and two-index symmetric representations. We discover that for the gravitational-wave signals analysis, there are significant differences between the various representations. Interestingly we also observe that the two-index symmetric representation leads to the strongest first-order phase transition and therefore to a higher chance of being detected by the Big Bang Observer experiment. Our study of the confinement and chiral phase transitions is further applicable to extensions of the Standard Model featuring composite dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available