4.4 Article

General bounds on holographic complexity

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2022)040

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence; Black Holes; Gauge-gravity correspondence

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-2011905]
  2. MIT department of physics
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0012567]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy Early Career Award [DE-SC0021886]
  5. Aker Scholarship
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021886] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We prove a positive volume theorem for asymptotically AdS spacetimes and a positive holographic complexity theorem under the Complexity=Volume proposal. We also provide a holographic proof of Lloyd's bound for a class of bulk spacetimes and establish a partial rigidity result for wormholes.
We prove a positive volume theorem for asymptotically AdS spacetimes: the maximal volume slice has nonnegative vacuum-subtracted volume, and the vacuum-subtracted volume vanishes if and only if the spacetime is identically pure AdS. Under the Complexity=Volume proposal, this constitutes a positive holographic complexity theorem. The result features a number of parallels with the positive energy theorem, including the assumption of an energy condition that excludes false vacuum decay (the AdS weak energy condition). Our proof is rigorously established in broad generality in four bulk dimensions, and we provide strong evidence in favor of a generalization to arbitrary dimensions. Our techniques also yield a holographic proof of Lloyd's bound for a class of bulk spacetimes. We further establish a partial rigidity result for wormholes: wormholes with a given throat size are more complex than AdS-Schwarzschild with the same throat size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available